BIG BANG, A BOGUS THEORY
Abu Mohi Musa
Nowadays the theory which made a great stir in the minds
of the scientists that is `Big Bang Theory’
or great explosion. The theory
which is very much acceptable to the scientists regarding creation of vast
universe. The Big Bang Theory is one of the noteworthy. According to theory of
relativity of Einstein, time and space i.e. this vast universe started creation
through great explosion and will be ended in big crunch. As per Big Bang
Theory, given by Steffen Hawking, the
infinite time from far away the whole substance were congealed in a collected
body. Almost 1500 to 2000 years back from this time forth there was an
explosion in this congealed substance. As a result the clusters of the
substance started scudding towards around
with an unimaginable motion and in course of time the milky ways,
planets, stars were created from the clusters. As the clusters continued
fleeting due to great explosion in the substance, the milky ways go apart from
each other.
Scientist
Steffen Hawking, in the expanding universe
chapter of his book namely `Brief History of Time’, commented , ` The
result of the final research of me (Hawking) and Penrose in 1970 was a joint proclamation. Last of all it was proved in
this thesis that if the theory of relativity given by Einstein is right and whatever the substance
we observe in the universe, if the existence of this substance is true, then it
is taken for granted that there was a great explosion happened in it. Therefore, our research have been accepted
and nowadays almost everybody have taken it lying down that the universe has
initiation for creation through a great explosion’.
There some
religion aspects found to be cited in
support of the Big Bang Theory for making it more acceptable. Perhaps on the
basis of this reason, the scientists have presented the Big Bang Theory with empathetically. They
told, the main cause of the creation of universe is big bang. In this context
the Big Bang Theory was established in the light of Hidus Religion Book
`Bhagabato’. It was told, when the unimaginable heat stroked on the substance
the nature of the creation was created. Subsequently the inert objects were
created through explosion and the universe was created in this way. The
scientists have denoted the explosion as
Hot Big Bang. That is called Big Bang Theory.
Steffen
Hawking also stated in origin of universe and its conclusion
chapter of his book `Brief History of
Time (Page 100) , it is apprehended that
at the time of great explosion the size of the universe was zero and heat was
unimaginable. With the expanding of
universe , the heat came down to near about one thousand degrees. This heat was
more than one thousand times of the central heat of the sun. In support of
this, there was an explanation stated in the
`Bhagabat.’ After explosion the unit of the heat was equivalent to one
thousand blazing suns. And the scientists
also proved that after explosion
the heat was equivalent to centre of the one thousand suns (Quran, Baibel, Beyd
and Science: Doctor S.C. Bos, page-104).
According to Book of Genesis related to the
theory of creation, the universe was
created five thousand years B.C. On the other hand the philosophers along with
Aristotle had not taken this idea as acceptable. They believed the humankind and
its around adjacent world were remained
constantly and would remain for ever. I am consentient with this views.
Subsequently
philosopher Immanuel Kant in 1781 stated in his book namely `Critique of Pure
Reason’ that `the vast universe has its commencement . In support of this
theory there is a logical reason and the
universe will remain forever, there is
also the same logical reason behind this theory.’
In favor of the
theory he showed such an argument and stated, `if there is no initial stage of
the universe, then the infinite time can not be impossible before any
occurrence. Before the commencement of universe there was no existence of
time.’ That is why he commented that the
universe was remained in the past and will remain for ever.
The famous
astronomer Edwin Hubble conducted the observation on different galaxies. In
1920 he made research on lighting-ray coming from other galaxies. He observed in the experiment that those
galaxies always beat retreat. Like that the other galaxies are going parted
from our milky way i.e. going
behind. It means the universe is always
expanding. (The Encyclopedia
of Space Travel and Astronomy, Octopus Book Ltd. London
Before going to elaborate discussion
about the `Big Bang Theory’ I like to draw the attention to the terrain for
giving the theory to make it more intelligible. The scientists those who have
given the theory or supported to it, could they determine what was the terrain
of giving the tenet? Is it materialistic
terrain or Idealistic terrain? Big Bang Theory
is neither idealistic nor materialistic. But it is obviously synthetic
terrain i.e. mixed terrain. Materialistic terrain means, those who gives the
dogma that always related to matter,
physics etc. As for example-
medical science, electrical science, engineering etc. Idealistic terrain
means, it relates to the idealism. As for example- Philosophy, its origination,
Knowledge etc. Regarding the tenet of the materialism, the idealists
(philosophers) have no right to make any comment. Similarly the materialists
have no right to make any comment on idealism. They can not criticize the tenet
of each others. There are far differences in between two terrains- materialism
and idealism. As like the differences of
microscope and telescope .Differences like earth and heaven . We may
call the materialist as
materialistic instrument i.e.
microscope and idealist as idealistic
instrument i.e. telescope. As regards to microscope, the telescope can
not be used and similarly microscope can
not be used as regards to telescope. Only the synthetic terrain (mixed
terrain), the materialist will give the physical evidence i.e. proof and
idealist will give the philosophical argument. If both physical evidence and
philosophical argument are concentrated
in the same point, then we may apprehend the tenet is true. Which is the
synthetic terrain? The Evolution Theory of Darwin, origin of humankind,
creation of the vast universe and its destruction, creation of earth and its
destruction, time and space, whether the sky is finite or infinite etc. All these subjects for discussion, come under the purview of synthetic terrain.
It is neither completely idealistic nor it is completely materialistic. So to prove the Big Bang
Theory, where is the philosophical
arguments ? None of the scientists could realize about this basic problems.
First of all I
want to raise some questions on Big Bang
Theory. If any explosion was happened in
the collected body of congealed substance
before 1500 to 2000 corer years back, but how they could determine the
time of l500 to 2000 years ? Where they have got the history of its origin? How
the time came in existence? They could not explain it. Secondly: the question is here, where
they have got the substance of universe, how it was created? Is there any
answer for it? It is very ridiculous
that they depicted the story of the creation of universe from the explosion in
the collected body, as if they went there and saw it in their own eyes. Big
Bang Theory is inferential idea. It has neither materialistic evidence nor it
has idealistic argument. Not only that whatever the theories given by the
scientist or materialist in the synthetic terrain are
wrong. Like Big Bang Theory is also bogus and absolutely bogus in the
philosophical angle of vision.
Why these are
branded as bogus ? There are so many causes behind it. First of all they have
to elaborate how the substance of the
universe was created, its shape, whether round or flat, its length, motion or
motionless or steady like a rock. Whether the instance of explosion occurred in
the collected body for one time, whether it was liquid or solid?
There are so many questions
raised before us but no answer is given till today.
It was told, the
clusters scudding around with an unimaginable motion after the explosion in the
congealed substance. On the other hand some
scientists have stated that, `there are so many stars in the universe,
of which the light has not yet reached in the earth. Does it not mean, still
those stars are being created ? How these new stars are created ? According to Big Bang Theory every stars and
planets were created at a time due to great explosion in the substance.
Generally we may ask the question, before reaching the light of that stars, how
the sun could reach at its orbit position, where it moves round ? How much distance of the sun was measured
from the congealed substance ? Where the clusters got such this motion to reach from its unknown destination?
Practically in the eyes of philosophy Mr. Steffen Hawking made a comic
sentiment giving the Big Bang Theory. Steffen Hawking said, `if the theory of
relativity of Einstein is right and whatever the quantity of substance we
observe, if its existence is true, then a great explosion was inevitably
occurred.
We like to say that the existence of the word `if ‘ is no longer existent in the vocabulary of philosophy. He himself thrown out
the matter into the dustbin of doubt telling the word `if’. It is not at all a
religious matter that we shall have to take it lying down. It is neither a
materialistic nor idealistic. It is a terrain of synthetic i.e. mixed terrain.
There must have both the physical
evidence i.e. materialistic proof and idealistic or philosophical arguments. There is no cause of belief, if it
has no material evidence and philosophical reason. He told, `whatever the
quantity of substance in the universe we observe, if its existence is true.’
Here Hawking also doubted regarding the existence of substance. we can observe the substance as it is existent.
Somebody may take it for granted but from the philosophical out look we can not
accept the theory as true.
Not only that, some scientists did not accept
it. They told, at the very beginning of the universe, the size or area of the
substance was zero, heat, density and compactness were out of limit. For that reason all the known scientific rules break in this moment. Owing to this it
is impossible to say anything in this regards. Secondly, the supporters of this
theory could not tell, where was the centre of the explosion in the
universe that occurred?
Thirdly it was
impossible to arrange for being created
of the universe with the measurement and
well decoration. Fourthly if the milky way is going far away from each
other after explosion, then the milky
ways should have already gone
evanesced from others. But that is not
happened. Fifthly, after corers and corers years the centre-place of the explosion would have created a big
cavity. But the supporters of the Big
Bang Theory could not discover the cavity or empty place. From the
philosophical out look we can express in this regards that it has neither materialistic
proof nor it has idealistic argument. So we can say with emphasis that it is
bogus and absolutely bogus.
The supporters
of the Big Bang Theory cited that in the time immemorial all the congealed
substance was in collected body , but how the congealed substance was created,
they could not explain. Some how it was created but whey it was congealed in a
certain place ? If there is any explosion occurred in the congealed substance,
the clusters of the substance not being the spherical planets would have kept it selves hovering aimlessly in the sky
for unknown period. To prove the tenet, these philosophical arguments are
necessary, which was not comprehended by the scientists. As whatever the theory
given by Charles Darwin regarding
creation of humankind was not acceptable. Because there was no philosophical
argument, which was not comprehended by him. As a result the theory regarding
the creation of humankind has already gone
into dustbin. None is taking it
for discussion or for critique .
As for that
reasons not only Big Bang Theory but all the theories in the synthetic terrain were not acceptable
and gone in vain. Even whatever the
theory regarding the destruction of the earth given by the scientist was
bogus. In the era of scientific device
how the scientists steep towards the
pinnacle of science with boasted attitude, for that reason the general people
can not avert themselves from the belief of Darwin’s theory. They have had the
reliance on it, as the scientist could afford to give the eye-sight of the blind through the
cornea grafting. That very day is coming when the scientist would have given
the life to a dead body. This is a materialist terrain. So they can do and undo
everything whatever they can think but in the idealistic terrain, even the
synthetic terrain they are very
much innocent, ignorant and very much weak.
The theory which
was given by the scientist about the creation and destruction of the universe,
those are as ` the universe was created through a great explosion from ancient
black whole and then started its
expanding . Last of all it will be again destructed in big crunch in black whole. After that what will be the
next, none of the scientists could explain it. Whether the vast universe will
be created again or not ? If not created, how long it will remain as it was ?
If the Big Bang
Theory is baseless and illogical, then the question of existence of black
whole does not arise at all. Similarly
the question of expanding of the universe and crunch also does not arise. It is
a fanciful idea of the scientists. We don’t have any philosophical argument in
this respect to believe it.
Immanuel Kant
stated that there was a commencement of the universe. Before it there was no existence
of time. He also commented that in the past time the universe was existent and will remain in future.
If he apprehends
that the universe means galaxies, planets , stars etc. then we can
say, the theory of Immanuel Kant is not acceptable. Otherwise if he supposes
the vast empty space, which was filled up with imperceptible energy, then it
can be acceptable to some extent. Because the empty space filled up with those
energy which has also wellhead of its creation. If we suppose, before creation
of the energy the empty space was filled
up with murkiness.
After
destruction of everything there will remain only murkiness. The existence of
galaxies, planets, stars will be obliterated from the universe, even no energy
will remain. Afterwards again the universe will be created. In this way it will
continue which will have no end. Is it a
fact like that? If it is fact, despite it will not be acceptable.
We think, no animal kingdom of the earth was
created from any other animal, like no
planets were created from any other starts. Every planets and stars were
created in its own body directly from
the invisible energy. If it is told that the earth was created from the sun.
Then the question will arise that how the sun and innumerable planets, stars
have been created ? The scientists told that many of the planets and starts
have gone destructed. I am unanimous with them. I shall also tell, as many as
planets and stars have been destructed and similarly some planets and stars
have been created. If the creation of
the planets and stars are suspended, then the vast empty space would
have been vacated and remained devoid of
planets and stars due to destruction of planets and stars. Einstein
told, the energy can be turned into substance and substance can be turned into
energy. In my book, Sristy Thekey Dhowbangsha (From Creation to Destruction), I
explained that the energy is bifurcated. One is positive and another is
negative. In the substance one is proton and another is electron. Due to
coalescence of two energy , it creates even not only substance, but creates
also the livelihood and inert objects.
So we can say, the wellhead of all the planets and stars is invisible energy.
If the universe is created in the great explosion, then every planets and
starts have not been spherical, rather they have remained scattered and
misplaced. No change was expected that
have not come over the scudding clusters.
Then how the
universe has been created ? The answer was given already. The energy is the
main cause of the whole creation. Still
the energy is being turned into substance and livelihood. The universe has no
commencement and also has no end. But the stars, planets, all these things will
be destroyed gradually and the cavity
will be filled up with stars, planets etc. after its creation on its own orbit.
We can find an
analogy in respect of the energy which is being turned into substance. Once there was no land in the world, the
whole world was a big ocean that filled up with water. Now one fourth space of
the world is land and remaining is water. Once the world will be fully devoid
of water and whole world will be filled up and
covered with land gradually (Destruction of world : From Creation to Destruction). Once the
whole water would have been exhausted .
There are seven layers of air above the surface of the earth. All these layers
will be destroyed when the water will be exhausted. Last layer of the air
sustains 4 thousand degrees f.h. heat.
This heat will directly hit on the land of the earth.
Then the land of
the world will be like volcanic copper. The ignition will continue corers after
corers years when it has the capability of giving light like other stars. Last
of all the world will be obliterated
from the vast universe for ever. According to science, at the very
beginning the world started initiating
from imperceptible energy to gas, gas to lava, lava to water. Afterwards
this world will become existent with
expanding land for a certain period. According to theory of balance, this world
will be destructed through the following stages as how it was created. After
depletion of water, the world will be covered with solid land, then land to
lava and lava to gas. Like count down system. Where a jot of dust will not remain
existent. If the planets and stars are not
annihilated and only creation of that is continued, then the whole space
of the universe would have been filled up with planets and stars like storehouse
which loaded huddling together with
goods. Not a single space in the universe
can be derived for another star or planet. So creation and destruction of the things
are universal system. Many planets and
stars have been created , at the same time
some of them have been destructed. As no stars and planets have been created in a day and it will not be
destructed like that. According to version of science, the vast universe is
expanding around. In my opinion, it is absolutely bogus. But every planets and
every stars are moving round on its own orbit and nothing else.
As earth moves
round centering the sun. If the earth is not moved, then what will be the inconvenience
for us. Firstly the question of creation as well destruction of anything belongs to the world
does arise. Secondly we don’t have the
time for measuring anything . On the other hand even no creatures can be
created. We may compare the earth with an ice-factory. Ice is created from
water. If the factory remains closed, the factory can not produce any ice. Like
that if the earth is stopped moving, then no creatures can be created. Any
creation is not possible if the earth does not move round. Due to this spinning
of the earth the invisible energy is turning to be life and substance, like ice
is created from water. At the same time the land of the earth is expanding towards around which consumes the
water. Everything as well as expanding land in the ocean are also the
visible phenomenon of the energy. Due to
expanding of the land, one day the land will cover the whole earth, when a
single drop of water will not remain existent. We admit the version of science
that all the planets and starts are moving round on its own orbit. But there is
no reason to believe that the universe has been created in a great explosion or
big bang.
The terrestrial
in the ocean will expand gradually day by day and one day the earth will be devoid
of water and subsequently ended in that way. The imperceptible energy is being turned into substance and this is the
evidence of its formation from energy to substance. Steffen Hawking and
his seconders could not give any evidence regarding great explosion in the
congealed substance. This theory as it
comes under purview of the synthetic
terrain which given by the scientist is
bogus.
Now the question
may arise that if the Big Bang Theory is bogus, then why the people of whole
world has taken it for granted ? How the electronics media made a great stir
with this theory? How Steffen Hawking could keep the peoples stultified with
it? Its reply is here. It is surprising that the knowledge (fundamental
knowledge not knowledge gathered by experience) level of 99.99 per cent peoples of the whole world is below knowledge level of beasts and birds.
The person who passed the M.A. acquired
knowledge from books that is called knowledge gathered by experience. This
knowledge is acquired by sight seeing, listening, knowing .
The man is born with only one
fragment of knowledge which is called inner knowledge and the other creatures
are born with 3 fragment of knowledge. That is why the snake after coming out
from the egg shield can run, rear its head, eat and bite. The chicken baby
after come out from the egg shield can stand, move down, eat, speaking. So is it possible to grasp the theory of
Steffen Hawking on the part of the peoples that the Big Bang Theory is fancied?
Of course some scientists were dissentient with this
theory, but they could not give any authentic proof against it. So scientist
Steffen Hawking became hero in the vacant field of synthetic terrain where he
alone scored a lot of goals.
Nowadays anybody does not have the interest to analyze
the theory of evolution. Because it does not have any authenticity and it has
already gone to the dustbin. Now we are
waiting for that day when the Big Bang
Theory will go to the dustbin like theory of revolution.
Abu
Mohi Musa
Philosopher / Journalist / columnist
E-Mail
: abumohimusa@yahoo.com
